VERSION SPACES AND THE CANDIDATE-ELIMINATION ALGORITHM

 

VERSION SPACES AND THE CANDIDATE-ELIMINATION ALGORITHM

 

•        The key idea in the CANDIDATE-ELIMINATION algorithm is to output

•        a description of the set of all hypotheses consistent with the training examples

Note difference between definitions of consistent and satisfies

·       An example x is said to satisfy hypothesis h when h(x) = 1, regardless of whether x is a positive or negative example of the target concept.

·       An example x is said to consistent with hypothesis h iff h(x) = c(x)

The LIST-THEN-ELIMINATION algorithm

The LIST-THEN-ELIMINATE algorithm first initializes the version space to contain all hypotheses in H and then eliminates any hypothesis found inconsistent with any training example.

___________________________________________________________________________

1. VersionSpace c a list containing every hypothesis in H

2. For each training example, (x, c(x))

remove from VersionSpace any hypothesis h for which h(x ≠ c(x)

3. Output the list of hypotheses in VersionSpace

_________________________________________________________________________

The LIST-THEN-ELIMINATE Algorithm

·       List-Then-Eliminate works in principle, so long as version space is finite.

·       However, since it requires exhaustive enumeration of all hypotheses in practice it is not feasible

Consistent Hypothesis and Version Space

•        F1 - > A, B

•        F2 - > X, Y

•        Instance Space: (A, X), (A, Y), (B, X), (B, Y) – 4 Examples

•        Hypothesis Space: (A, X), (A, Y), (A, ø), (A, ?), (B, X), (B, Y), (B, ø), (B, ?), (ø, X), (ø, Y), (ø, ø), (ø, ?), (?, X), (?, Y), (?, ø), (?, ?) - 16 Hypothesis

•        Semantically Distinct Hypothesis: (A, X), (A, Y), (A, ?), (B, X), (B, Y), (B, ?), (?, X), (?, Y ), (?, ?), (ø, ø) – 10

Version Space: (A, X), (A, Y), (A, ?), (B, X), (B, Y), (B, ?), (?, X), (?, Y) (?, ?), (ø, ø),

•Training Instances

F1 F2 Target

A X Yes

A Y Yes

•Consistent Hypothesis are: (A, ?), (?, ?)

 

List-Then-Eliminate algorithm

•        Problems

ü  The hypothesis space must be finite

ü  Enumeration of all the hypothesis, rather inefficient

A More Compact Representation for Version Spaces

•        The version space is represented by its most general and least general members.

•        These members form general and specific boundary sets that delimit the version space within the partially ordered hypothesis space.

·       A version space with its general and specific boundary sets.

·       The version space includes all six hypotheses shown here, but can be represented more simply by S and G.

·       Arrows indicate instances of the more_general_than relation.

·       This is the version space for the EnjoySport concept learning problem and training example.

CANDIDATE-ELIMINATION Learning Algorithm

The CANDIDATE-ELIMINTION algorithm computes the version space containing all

hypotheses from H that are consistent with an observed sequence of training examples.

___________________________________________________________________________

Initialize G to the set of maximally general hypotheses in H

Initialize S to the set of maximally specific hypotheses in H

For each training example d, do

• If d is a positive example

• Remove from G any hypothesis inconsistent with d

• For each hypothesis s in S that is not consistent with d

• Remove s from S

• Add to S all minimal generalizations h of s such that

• h is consistent with d, and some member of G is more general than h

• Remove from S any hypothesis that is more general than another hypothesis in S

• If d is a negative example

• Remove from S any hypothesis inconsistent with d

• For each hypothesis g in G that is not consistent with d

• Remove g from G

• Add to G all minimal specializations h of g such that

• h is consistent with d, and some member of S is more specific than h

• Remove from G any hypothesis that is less general than another hypothesis in G

___________________________________________________________________________

CANDIDATE- ELIMINTION algorithm using version spaces

An Illustrative Example

CANDIDATE-ELIMINTION algorithm begins by initializing the version space to the set of all hypotheses in H;

•        Initializing the G boundary set to contain the most general hypothesis in H

           

                                                      

•        Initializing the S boundary set to contain the most specific (least general) hypothesis

ü  When the first training example is presented, the CANDIDATE-ELIMINTION algorithm checks the S boundary and finds that it is overly specific and it fails to cover the positive example.

ü  The boundary is therefore revised by moving it to the least more general hypothesis that covers this new example

ü  No update of the G boundary is needed in response to this training example because Go correctly covers this example.

When the second training example is observed, it has a similar effect of generalizing S further to S2, leaving G again unchanged i.e., G2 = G1 =G0

·       Consider the third training example. This negative example reveals that the G boundary of the version space is overly general, that is, the hypothesis in G incorrectly predicts that this new example is a positive example.

·        The hypothesis in the G boundary must therefore be specialized until it correctly classifies this new negative example

Given that there are six attributes that could be specified to specialize G2, why are there only three new hypotheses in G3?

·       For example, the hypothesis h = (?, ?, Normal, ?, ?, ?) is a minimal specialization of G2 that correctly labels the new example as a negative example, but it is not included in G3.

·     The reason this hypothesis is excluded is that it is inconsistent with the previously encountered positive examples

Consider the fourth training example:

•        This positive example further generalizes the S boundary of the version space. It also results in removing one member of the G boundary, because this member fails to cover the new positive example

•        After processing these four examples, the boundary sets S4 and G4 delimit the version space of all hypotheses consistent with the set of incrementally observed training examples.